Selling My Ideal Community

My ideal community is technologically advanced and environmentally conscious, the basis of which is cutting edge urban agricultural production. My community attracts a growing population of people who appreciate both the urban and rural setting. Great parks would crisscross the grid with great expanses of green adding natural beauty to the massive skyline. Everyone in my community will have a designated plot of land in which they are required to grow 30% of their own food. To compensate for the amount of time that would be required for each family or person to grow food the maximum work week would be 20 hours long. The education system would include canning and food preparation as requirements from high school through the second year in university. The government of my community would subsidize the price for organic fertilizer and nutrients that the community could not produce itself. The government would also place a ban on food that is not able to be grown in a 500 mile radius. While my community would welcome families and nurture children in the care of the natural world, it would excel at being a haven for young couples and independent singles who wish to expand their intellect in the company of other intellectuals and leading experts in their fields. People would flock to my community not only to taste the fine fruits and vegetables, but also to come and hear the greatest minds of the world speak in a great forum that would grace the very center of the city. Through the use of LCD screen technology built into every building these speeches would be broadcast to the whole community. As to not add to the noise level, you would need to possess an ear piece that would adjust to the frequency that contained the sound for the speech. If you are a person that values nature and working hard in the garden, listening to intellectual people and perhaps have some fun Saturday night (because of course everyone is Adventist) my community would be the best place to be. Come and me!

Urbanism

The esteemed Foreign Policy magazine's current issue is focusing on the rise of the city. All over the world millions of former country dwellers are leaving their traditional roots behind in search of a better life in the city. What does the city have to offer? At least in the more developed countries it means better education, better resources, networking. Both articles point out that the city with its dying interior and sprawling suburbs are on the way out. The new phase of urbanism belongs to the metropolises of Tokyo, Sydney, and Beijing.
I'm not certain that we are going to see the total disappearance of country boarders as the article "beyond city limits" seems to suggest., humans are much too territorial for that. I do think however that a renewed wave of "metropolitinism" will arise, where people are prouder to belong to their city than to their state or territory. What ever the future, it is obvious that the large city is here to stay, I personally welcome such a change with open arms.

Gandhi and C.S Lewis

Materialism and Idealism

The “conversion” stories of C.S Lewis and Mahatma Gandhi are two example of working professionals who for some reason or another decided to abandon their current way of life in lieu of something more substantial. In the case of C.S Lewis a staunch atheist, his conversion to Christianity came after he realized that for him “there was nothing else to do but become a Christian”. I chose Mahatma Gandhi because his transformation from lawyer to Indian Liberator is just as stunning as C.S Lewis’ story of conversion.

These two stories touch on some of the key issues the “Teacher” was trying to outline in the book of Ecclesiastes. I think that C.S Lewis realized that all of the money in the world didn’t stop his mother from dying, it didn’t give him a better childhood and it certainly didn’t give him a purpose for his life. It was at this moment that he realized just as “Teacher” did that God rather than our self pleasure is the most important thing. In Gandhi’s case he chose to devote his life to the restoration and preservation of Indian sovereignty, and the fair treatment of his fellow Indians. He saw the toil and oppression that the Indian people were being subjected to under the British and just like “Teacher” (Ecclesiastes 4:1) he chose to do something about it.  

These two men have left completely different marks in the world. However both of them utilized the wisdom of “Teacher” and made their lives count for something other than themselves.